Programs, written as procurement evidence.

The client needed consistent human preference and critique data across several languages to improve a general-purpose assistant — and their internal team couldn’t hold quality steady as volume grew.

Recruiting, qualification, rubric training, calibration, production, layered QA and adjudication — run as a managed program with dedicated leads.

Pairwise preference judgments with documented rationale, structured response critiques, and rewrite tasks, across multiple languages and domains.

Gold tasks and calibration sets per language; inter-annotator agreement tracked per batch; disagreements routed to senior adjudication.

Access-controlled environment, workforce NDAs, and data handling per the client’s requirements.

A stable, repeatable calibration loop the client’s research team could iterate their rubric against — with agreement held steady as the program scaled.

A fast-moving image and video generation product needed human evaluation of output quality — prompt adherence, visual artifacts and safety — that could keep pace with frequent releases.

Stood up and qualified a specialist evaluation team, designed the scoring rubric with the client, and ran calibrated production with QA.

Rubric scoring and pairwise comparison of generated images and video for adherence, coherence and artifacts, plus safety flags.

Calibration against reference examples, embedded gold checks, and secondary review on flagged and borderline outputs.

Work performed in an approved environment with role-scoped access and confidentiality controls.

A calibrated review pipeline that scaled with release cadence while holding a consistent quality bar the product team could rely on.

The client needed a defensible expert layer to evaluate model reasoning and code correctness — beyond what non-specialists could reliably judge.

Sourced and qualified coding and STEM specialists, built the assessment and calibration, and managed production with adjudication.

Structured evaluation of code correctness, reasoning quality and step-level process against detailed rubrics.

Specialist qualification tests, calibration against worked solutions, and senior adjudication with traceable rationale.

Confidential handling of evaluation sets and model outputs under NDA and access controls.

An expert-review layer with documented disagreement resolution and reviewer coaching the client could stand behind.

Ahead of a release, the client needed structured adversarial testing and policy evaluation against their usage standards.

Qualified and briefed analysts, translated client policy into an evaluation rubric and harm taxonomy, and ran managed red teaming.

Adversarial and jailbreak attempts, harmful-content categorization, and policy pass/fail assessment with examples.

Calibrated categorization, secondary review on severe cases, and adjudication for contested judgments.

Sensitive-content handling policies, access controls and attention to analyst wellbeing.

Structured findings and examples that fed directly into the client’s guardrails, policies and training data before launch.